The Ernie Wrenn ones are the only beltfed mac of any flavor I've heard of. See two posts below from the internets (not my posts). But magfed uppers that you could do the same thing to have passed. So far the ones made seem to turn into sputterguns without the lower and can be fired without the lower or with minimal (hold it against the wall, etc.) modifications and ATF ruled they are machine guns. Increasing barrel length increases muzzle velocity of the projectiles, which are already traveling at the border of sub/super sonic velocities.Legality so far. It is also not useful to have a longer barrel on a direct-blowback weapon which is designed primarily to be used with a suppressor for silent operation. The open-bolt-vs-closed-bolt issue is thus no difference at all between the two weapons. Both guns now have variants that fire from the closed-bolt position for civilian sales in the United States. Both guns were designed to be fired from the open-bolt position. I think that it is odd that being a heavier and longer weapon is somehow considered to be an advantage.Īlso, when it was explained that the Uzi fires from an open-bolt chamber whereas the Mac doesn’t, well, that’s not really true. While the Uzi has a weight of 3.5 kilograms, the Mac has a weight of 2.84 kilograms.
“When comparing the weight and length of the two guns, the Uzi has the upper hand over the MAC 10. UZI guns have more weight, and are longer than the MAC guns. Uzi guns have a longer history than the MAC 10 guns.ģ. The MAC 10 comes from the US and Uzi guns come from Israel.Ģ. On the other hand, the MAC has an effective range of 50 metres and a maximum of 100 metres.ġ. When considering their range, the UZI has an effective range of 100 metres, and a maximum range of 200 metres. The UZI has a muzzle velocity of 390 m/s, whereas the MAC has 366 m/s for a 9 mm and 280 m/s for a. Yet again, the UZi and the Mac differ in their muzzle velocity. 45 ACP MAC can fire 1,145 rounds a minute.
When considering their rate of firing, the UZI can fire 600 rounds in a minute, and the 9mm MAC can fire about 1,090 rounds a minute. 45 ACP and 9×19 mm parabellum cartridges. The barrel length of the UZI is 260 mm, whereas the MAC 10 guns have a barrel length of 146 mm.Īnother difference that can be seen, is between the cartridges that are used. The UZI also has a longer barrel than the MAC 10. The MAC 10 has a length of 269 mm with its stock removed, 295 mm with its stock retracted, and 548 mm with its stock extended. When comparing the lengths, the UZI comes to 640 mm with its stock extended, and 470 mm with its stock collapsed. While the UZI has a weight of 3.5 kilograms, the Mac has a weight of 2.84 kilograms. When comparing the weight and length of the two guns, the UZI has the upper hand over the MAC 10. Well, this design helps to keep the gun cool during continuous firing. Unlike the MAC 10, UZI machine guns have an open bolt blow black operating design. UZI machine guns are considered to be better than MAC 10 guns. UZI guns were developed in the 1940’s, by Uziel Gal. The MAC 10, which is considered a blow back operated gun, was developed in 1964 by Gordon B Ingram. UZI guns have a longer history than the MAC 10 guns. Here we talk about some of the differences between the MAC 10 and UZI guns. Well, the MAC 10 comes from the US, and UZI guns come from Israel. Both the MAC 10 and UZI are pistol calibre guns. MAC 10, or Military Armament CorporationModel 10, and Uzi are machine guns that have beenused for military purposes for a very long time.
0 kommentar(er)
